Decay as Saturation

Decay as Saturation

In conventional physics, decay is treated as a probabilistic event: an unstable particle has a chance to disintegrate, described by a half-life or decay width. The Standard Model attributes this to coupling between fields and violations of symmetry.

In modal dynamics, decay is not probabilistic, not stochastic, and not field-driven. It is the natural outcome of coherence saturation—when a mode can no longer maintain its internal structure within a shifting anchoring landscape.


Coherence Limits

A mode is sustained only so long as:

But coherence is not infinite. Each region of space can support only so much modal structure before anchoring capacity is exhausted. This occurs through:

When this threshold is crossed, the mode’s internal cost rises sharply, and anchoring fails.


Structural Collapse

The failure of a mode is not a sharp “event.” It is a structural breakdown:

This process is what we observe as decay.

The products of decay are not chosen randomly. They are the only modes that can stably re-anchor in the available coherence landscape.

Thus:


Why It Appears Probabilistic

From a distance, decay appears random. But this is an illusion caused by:

Probability in decay reflects our ignorance of structural thresholds, not a fundamental randomness.

(See Appendix AH — Composite Modes and Appendix AI — Anchoring Instability.)


Decay is not collapse.
It is structural reorganisation under stress—governed by the same rules that sustain coherence.